Built around patent enforcement
We focus on accused products, potentially infringing listings, seller-heavy marketplaces, source records, samples, and defendant grouping.
For patent litigators
Pre-filing investigation for seller-heavy patent enforcement.
Attorneys bring judgment, strategy, and legal analysis. CopyCatch handles the manual work of finding more potentially infringing listings, expanding seller pools, and organizing claim-relevant source records.
Up to 90% Cost Reduction For Pre-Filing Investigation
Platform
What CopyCatch does
A managed investigation service for the factual work behind patent enforcement: listing discovery, seller-pool expansion, source records, sample tracking, defendant grouping, and claim-chart preparation support.
Potentially infringing listing discovery
We surface marketplace listings and product pages that deserve attorney review.
Seller-pool expansion
We connect listings to storefronts, sellers, related stores, and repeat product clusters.
Claim-relevant source records
We organize screenshots, source links, product feature notes, and visible support by asserted patent feature.
Attorney review package
We package the factual record for counsel without making legal conclusions.
Seller and listing review
We review storefronts, listings, product photos, and visible feature references.
Sample tracking
We track sample purchases, delivery status, order records, and product identifiers.
See your ROI
See what CopyCatch saves on pre-filing investigation.
Listing discovery, seller-pool expansion, claim-relevant source records, sample tracking, and defendant grouping: model the time and dollars returned when the manual work moves off the firm's plate.
Estimated monthly savings$19,125
Your matters
Labor assumptions
Pre-filing savings analysis
Estimated monthly savings$19,125
Returned when CopyCatch handles the repetitive investigation work before attorney review.
Manual investigation cost$22,500
CopyCatch-supported cost$3,375
Hours returned38 hrs/mo
Cost reduction85%
85%
Workflow coverageListing discovery, seller-pool expansion, source records, sample status, and defendant grouping move to CopyCatch. Counsel keeps judgment, strategy, and filings.
Illustrative model. Actual scope depends on matter complexity.
Impact
Before vs CopyCatch
The goal is simple: less manual research before counsel can decide whether a matter is worth pursuing.
WorkflowTodayWith CopyCatch
Listing discoveryKnown listings onlyExpanded listing set
Seller reviewSeller research by handSeller pool prepared
Source recordsScattered screenshotsSource records organized
Sample statusEmail trackingCentral workflow
Filing decisionHigh cost firstCleaner counsel review
Why us
Why CopyCatch
A single seller may control multiple listings, storefronts, or product variants. CopyCatch is built to catch that expansion work before counsel spends time on legal analysis.
Managed service, not self-serve software
You scope the matter with us. We handle the labor-intensive investigation workflow.
Attorney judgment stays with counsel
CopyCatch surfaces potential listings and organizes factual material. Licensed counsel determines infringement, claim analysis, filing strategy, and settlement decisions.
Built by a patent litigator
Built from 22+ years of patent enforcement.
Nick Lee brings 22+ years of patent enforcement experience and a track record of $225M+ in judgments. CopyCatch is built from the factual work litigators need before they can advise a client, shape strategy, and decide what to file.